About Me

Name: Stuart London
Email: fencoraau@yahoo.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 
politics

Good America PAC: My new calling

 
I've decided to do more than vote and write and get more involved in our political process.
Myself and Marina Kats, a prominent Philadelphia lawyer and the Republican candidate for Congress in the PA 13th congressional district last year, have started our own political action committee. The FEC gave us their approval in August, 2009.
It is called Good America PAC because we want to support people running for office who 'will be good for America'.
We are bi-partisan and not affiliated with any specific party or candidate. This year, we are taking baby steps, endorsing six canditates running for county office in Southeastern Pennsylvania. Hopefully, we will be more active in 2010.
 
Out website is www.goodamericapac.com
 
Check us out.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Sports is distraction from reality

 
This country is facing many problems: a failing economy, two wars (maybe more on the horizon) and debates on many other important issues that need to take place.
 
For some reason, I think those elected to office should really concentrate on like the important stuff at the moment.
 
So I get kind of antsy, maybe even ticked, when I've been seeing the IMPORTANT recent congressional action.
 
*How about the the House Energy and Commerce Committee commerce, trade and consumer protection subcommittee grilling the guy who runs the college football Bowl Championship Series on why college football playoff does not have a playoff.
 
*Tennessee representative Steve Cohen has written a letter to the NBA and the player’s union, asking the League to scrap the 19-year-old age minimum requirement for the NBA Draft.
 
Now, these actions were mostly about congressman looking good in front of the home folks ('See, I fought for our ---'s to get into the BCS bowls') but the appearance is pretty pathetic.
 
If you have time to worry about what college football uses as a format or that a future multi-millionaire basketball player has to go - horrors - to college for a year before cashing in, you can explain that to the locals. 
 
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Go Sarah Go in 2012

 

"I like Sarah Palin because all the people who dislike her I have no respect for" - Dennis Miller.

I live in Pennsylvania, which is suppose to be one of those swing states that you need to carry to be elected president, so I guess the opinion of voters here counts a little bit more.

Well, I have some bad news to report. Unfortunately, the people here have bought, by and large, the image of the Governor of Alaska presented by the mainstream media.

Liberals look on her with ovious disdain, but even when I bring her name up with my more conservative or independent acquinatances, all I get usually is a laugh and 'how could you support HER?" They dislike Obama and will vote against him in 2012 'unless Palin is running, she's an idiot'.

Now it is not universal, Meg Sharkey's growing grassroots organization Conservative Allies of PA is proof of that (www.conservativeallies.com) but I have heard from too many people who I would consider 'swing' voters who decide elections that Palin is anathema to them.,

In the Keystone State the view of too many people is that Palin is jsut a not very bright, inexperienced hick with a loco family who was in way over her head running for Vice President .

They have not seen through the fog the media put up and, as anyone who has followed her career, seen her interviews and speechs minus Couric, Gibson, could tell she is a bright, intelligent and savvy woman who has the nation's best interest at heart and rejects the Washington establishment.

Which brings me to my point: Sarah must run in 2012.

Little history lesson.

In 1968, Ronald Reagan ran for president after being elected Governor of California two years earlier. He was pillioried in the media, called dumb, inexperienced, way over his head and basically was considered a joke by the main stream media. He lost the nomination to Richard Nixon as he did not run a particularly good campaign.

In 1976, he came back, older, wiser, with a much improved campaign team and ready for a national run. He proceeded to almost take the nomination away fom President Gerald Ford in the last time the nomination was decided at the convention.

He did not win but through daily exposure 'The Great Communicator" was able to show the American people an unfiltered version of himself. Reagan being president was no longer a joke, he had established himself as a viable national figure capable of taking over the highest office in the land. Yes, the NYC-DC media still made fun of him as a 'movie cowboy' but the people now knew better and in 1980 he was elected in a landslide.

Waiting until 2016 or 2020, as some have suggested, will just harden the negative view many people have of Sarah. Now is the time.

Whether she wins or not (of course winning is better, could you imagine Brian Williams going 'The next president of the United States, Sarah Palin), the massive media attention she will receive, not for nine weeks where there is no time to fight back. and in her own campaign where she is not being told what to do by people not of her choosing, every day for a year straight, the real Sarah Palin will cut through the fog, and people will see her for who she really is. And then there will be no more curt comments or faces when someone professes their support for Sarah.

It sets her up for a clean run in 2016 not having to battle the demons of the past.

So Go, Sarah Go in 2012!!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

OK, eating crow

I guess my post saying how Republicans should support Specter did not sway many voter's, huh?
 
Specter saw he was going to be wiped out by Pat Toomey and jumped ship to the Democrats. Also crushed the hopes of many ambitious Democrats (poor Joe Sestak has nowhere to spend that $3 million now).
 
It will be interesting to see if the ordinary Democrat voter will embrace Specter now that he is one of them, particularly if a Tom Ridge is the GOP nominee.
 
Whatever, I am keeping my moth shut for a while on this topic. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Smiling for Sarah

Liberals learned long ago you don't attack conservatives on the issues. That would require, first, knowledge of an issue and even if mastered, then you have the fact the conservative probably has the viewpoint of a majority of the people and you don't want to give them additional publicity.

So the usual tactic by the Left is simple: Conservatives are not bright. Don't listen to them, they are not intelligent and thus you should not listen to what they say, listen to US. 
Think about it: What was the main critisism of the following politicians:
Ronald Reagan? He was stupid!
George W. Bush? He is stupid!
And what is the main problem Sarah Palin is critcized for? She is stupid!
 
No talk about her record as Governor of Alaska, or her views on the issues. It's attacks on her intelligence and, of course, attacks on her family.
 
Yep, she's just a blithering hillbilly idiot so tell her to go away.
 
Well, she has not done that..Guess what? Now that the election is over she is fighting back. She really is not as dumb as her critics wish she was.
 
Think about it. She became a governor at the age of 42 by beating an incumbent in a primary (almost unheard of) even though she is not rich,  not famous, had no organization and had never won an election outside the tiny town of Wasilla.
 
Yeah, stupid people accomplish that all the time.
 
In an interview for a documentary on the 2008 election, Palin talked about how unfair she felt the media had been in covering her (and also how the McCain campiagn mishandled her, but that's another post) a portion of which was posted by the documentary maker on You Tube..
 
Of course, the Left Media (which is almost all of them) called her a whiner and (of course) stupid. Her supporters of course said she was in the right.
 
The funniest attack on her was Robert Schlesinger on his US News blog saying Palin should get out of the spotlight for a while if she was smart. Um, she just sat for an interview for a documentary. It was the guy making it who posted on You Tube. Not her.
 
The most interesting part of the interview was when Palin said she would have been better received if Obama had picked her for the Democratic VP spot.
 
Let's think about this:
If Obama had picked someone who had made perceived racial comments about him in the past, said Obama was not qualified to be president, seemed to be a walking gaffe machine every time he opned his mouth, including being confused about the history of simple events, and was a long-time member of the Washington establishment, would there be lots of criticism by the media for Obama making a poor choice and showing.he had poor decision making qualities and not qualified to be president?
 
The answer is no because Joe Biden is all of the above and the pick was hailed as brilliant.
 
Palin, the only person running who actually has run a government. The beloved popular reformer of Alaska. Well, she's 'Caribou Barbie' with the IQ of a walnut. Oh, and her family is a bunch of dumb hicks. (Don't forget Obama said his family is off-limits and the media respected that)
 
No one questions Obama. He went to Harvard after all (although Bush went to Harvard and Yale and he is still called dumb). Palin's University of Idaho degree does not impress the Eastern-based media.
 
So, yeah, she is a bit ticked about all of this and - to paraphrase the movie Network - she's mad as hell and she is not going to take it anymore. 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A conservative against cannibalism

   In Pennsylvania, Republicans have a bit of dilemma, at least the ones who are a little to the right of Barack Obama.
   In 2010, there will be a Senate race and Arlen Specter will be running for his, geez, a fifth term? He is certainly someone to be admired for not only his political skills but his courageous fights against cancer.
   But, well, he ain't no conservative and I believe every time he has run for re-election he has had to face a challenge from the right. U.S. Rep. Pat Toomey only lost to him 51-49 in the primary in 2004.   
   There is talk of Toomey coming back for another run and others gearing up as well to take a crack at the ultimate RINO but I have a message for all of them - lay off!
   Yeah, I'd like a little more conservative votes from him too but in the current state of the GOP to use resources to knock off an incumbebt Republican senator just seems - well - stupid.
   In the current climate, all that will mean is having a Democrat take the seat. They do have 1.2 million more registered voters in the state. Do I want Specter or a Democrat, that should be an easy one.
   If we are going to recover as a party (and I don't think things are as dire as some whiners), we can't keep eating our own. If Republicans went after the Democrats with as much enthusiasm as the Rhode Island conservatives went after Lincoln Chafee, McCain might be president.
   There is an open governor's seat and plenty of leftist Democrats to go after. Let's concentrate on them, huh.
   Even Tweedledum and dummer (Reid and Pelosi) learned after failure after failure to elect people who thought like them in the heartland that it was better to have a conservative Democrat then a Republican, hence the rise of the Blue Dog Democrat.
   I'm not saying you have to now love Arlen Specter and work a phone bank for him, just don't be a cannibal. Find someone who can beat a Democrat in the fall.
 
p.s. Long-winded, aren't I on this subject (smile)
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »